The reissue is now the release
Three of the labels we cover showed us their pressing schedules for the year, on the condition that we did not print which schedule belonged to whom.
On all three, records that already exist outnumber records that do not.
The reasoning is not complicated and no label we spoke to was embarrassed by it.
A reissue has a known number. The first pressing sold four hundred and twelve copies, the label knows who bought them and how fast, and it can put five hundred into a plant with a defensible expectation. A new record by a new band has no number at all — it has a hope, and hopes do not survive contact with a twenty-six week lead time.
Twenty-six weeks is the mechanism. When a plant is six months out, a label is committing money in February for stock that arrives in August for a record it will sell in September. Everything about that transaction rewards certainty and punishes upside. A reissue that will definitely sell three hundred beats a debut that might sell eight hundred, because "might" now has to survive half a year.
We are not choosing the reissue over the new record. We are choosing the number we know over the number we do not, at a moment when the gap between committing and receiving is longer than it has ever been.
| Label | Titles pressed 2026 | Of which reissues |
|---|---|---|
| Pale Interval | 9 | 6 |
| Fathom Street Recordings | 7 | 3 |
| Notch & Co. | 11 | 7 |
What this does to new records is subtler than fewer of them, although there are fewer of them.
It changes which new records get made. A label with limited pressing slots gives them to the safest new signings — the ones that sound like something that already sold, because that is the only available proxy for a number. So the new releases that do get through are systematically more conservative than the ones that would have got through when a plant turned round in eight weeks and a label could take a flyer on something odd for two thousand dollars and find out in a month.
Nobody decided this. It is a lead time doing editorial work.
The counter-case, and it is a real one: reissues are how a catalogue stays alive, and a lot of what is being reissued deserved better than it got. Three of the best records anyone here has heard this year were made between 2004 and 2011 and are legitimately new to almost everybody who is buying them.
Both things are true. The interesting question is what a small label does when the plants catch up, and the honest answer we got from two of the three is that they have not thought about it, because they have been in this condition long enough that it stopped feeling like a condition.
Theo Bramhall
Member discussion